EU's MiCA regulation would have had limited impact on FTX debacle, lawmaker says

Partner offers
The Block may may earn a commission if you use our partner offers, at no extra cost to you.

Quick Take

  • The EU’s crypto regulation could have mitigated the impact of the FTX debacle had the legislation been in place.
  • EU policymakers have different takes on the level of impact.

EU lawmakers differ in their view on how the bloc's upcoming crypto regulation would have cushioned the blow from FTX's collapse.

The effects of FTX's filing for bankruptcy protection are rippling through the crypto industry. Other firms with exposure to the crypto giant are tumbling over. On Tuesday, crypto lending firm BlockFi prepared to file for bankruptcy protection too. Today, Genesis halted withdrawals. 

Some EU officials believe the Markets in Crypto Assets regulation — expected to be implemented by 2024 — would strongly protect EU citizens from the FTX ricochet. Others are less certain.

“I don't see exactly how MiCA would be able to fully stop or prevent this,” Ondrej Kovarik, center-right member of the European Parliament (MEP) who was a co-legislator on MiCA, told The Block in an interview. 

“I can imagine that some aspects of it would be mitigated or some or alleviated,” he said, but added: "It would be too simple to just to say that only crypto asset regulation would solve this.”

The MiCA framework outlines licensing processes for crypto service providers, like exchanges, to operate within the EU. It includes requirements on risk management, segregation of client and firm funds, prudential requirements, and the disclosure of conflict of interest — all of which could be relevant in addressing mishaps leading up to FTX’s collapse. The exact details still need to be fleshed out by Europe’s financial regulators. 

While MEP Stefan Berger, who was the Parliament’s main negotiator on the crypto laws, previously told The Block that “MiCA is the bulwark against Lehman Brothers moments such as the FTX case," Kovarik is more reserved.

The issue is broader than just crypto, according to Kovarik. “The real causes of the crash lie also somewhere else than what a crypto asset regulation can actually cover.”

The Czech MEP pointed out that the developing story in the crypto world is not limited to just one exchange. “We are talking about quite a high number of companies that were operating together. And that's quite a broad financial services ecosystem.”

Kovarik highlights that policymakers need time to see how the story plays out. “We should first analyze what exactly happened in this case and whether this is something that can be fully resolved by only adjusting the regulatory framework on crypto assets.”


© 2025 The Block. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

AUTHOR

Inbar is a reporter covering crypto policy and regulation with a focus on Europe. Before The Block, she worked with several publications in Brussels including The Parliament Magazine and Are We Europe. Inbar holds a bachelor's degree in international relations from University College Utrecht and a master's degree in international politics from KU Leuven.

See More

Editor

To contact the editors of this story: Madhu Unnikrishnan at [email protected], Michael McSweeney at [email protected]

WHO WE ARE

The Block is a news provider that strives to be the first and final word on digital assets news, research, and data.

+ Follow us on Google News
Connect with the block on

More by Inbar Preiss